Judicial & Litigation Database.
Comprehensive tracker of AI-related court rulings, sanctions, and legal precedents across jurisdictions.
| LOC | Date ↓ | Case Title | Summary | AI Tool | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 2025-08-27 | RBROT (nl) — incorrect citations noted; ai use not established | During the hearing, the court established that all Supreme Court citations in the defendant’s statement of defence were incorrect, including mismatched or non-existent ECLI references. Counsel attributed this to a technical issue converting a word file to pdf... | Not Disclosed | View |
 | 2025-08-25 | KG Berlin (DE) — automated filings criticised | In a regulatory-offence appeal context, the court criticised defence submissions as a meaninglessly automated form of litigation using irrelevant boilerplate and invented factual assertions. The court warned that such automated process conduct could lead to de... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
| | 2025-07-02 | AG Köln (DE) — ai-generated fake citations admonished | In a family-law order, the court stated that certain 'prerequisites' attributed to a cited high-court decision were not contained in that decision and were apparently generated by artificial intelligence and invented. The court also stated that the cited sourc... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
 | 2025-06-26 | CA Paris (FR) — chatgpt excerpt offered as access proof | The appeal concerned an interim order about restitution/access to cloud-hosted business data after termination of a software subscription. One party produced a ChatGPT excerpt and appeared to treat it as proof that the other party had the necessary access cred... | ChatGPT | View |
 | 2025-05-22 | utah ct app (us) — chatgpt hallucinated petition: fees, refund, donation | The court addressed a petition for interlocutory appeal containing fabricated or inapposite authorities, including a hallucinated case that appeared to exist only through ChatGPT. Counsel acknowledged that fabricated authority obtained from ChatGPT was includ... | ChatGPT | View |
| | 2025-05-20 | s.d. fla. (us) — ai hallucinated case: fees, cle, and fines | The court found that defense counsel filed a response containing a wholly fabricated case citation that could not be located, and counsel later admitted the citation resulted from using an AI tool without verification. The court emphasized Rule 11’s reasonabl... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
 | 2025-03-14 | trib. firenze (imp.) — chatgpt citations inaccurate; art. 96 request denied | The court addressed an objection that the opposing party’s brief relied on incorrect or non-existent case-law references. Counsel explained that a staff member used ChatGPT to search for jurisprudence and inserted the returned citations without verification, p... | ChatGPT (disclosed) | View |
| | 2025-02-24 | d. wyo. (us) — mx2.law hallucinations: pro hac vice revoked and fines | The court addressed motions in limine that cited numerous non-existent cases generated by an AI platform after counsel used an AI-assisted tool to insert Wyoming case law. The court emphasized that attorneys must verify sources and that AI hallucinations do n... | LegalTool: mx2.law | View |
| | 2024-11-25 | edtx (us) — claude hallucinated cases: $2,000 penalty and ai cle | The court considered whether plaintiff’s counsel should be sanctioned for filing a summary-judgment response containing AI-generated citations to non-existent cases and quotations that could not be found in cited authorities. Counsel acknowledged using the ge... | Claude | View |
 | 2024-09-09 | TC (ES) — warning and bar notification after AI-linked false quotations | The Constitutional Court reported that an amparo brief contained 19 quotations attributed to Constitutional Court decisions that did not exist, creating a misleading appearance of supporting case-law. The lawyer argued the irregularities were due to mistakes ... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |