Judicial & Litigation Database.
Comprehensive tracker of AI-related court rulings, sanctions, and legal precedents across jurisdictions.
| LOC | Date ↓ | Case Title | Summary | AI Tool | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 2025-10-08 | SAP Alicante (ES) — “AI hallucinations” vs deception; referral to bar | The Provincial Court found the appeal brief relied on multiple judicial decisions that “do not exist” and included incorrect quotes attributed to the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court. The court stated that the episode could reflect “hallucinations” prod... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
 | 2025-10-07 | OGH (AT) — ai-drafted filing rejected for incorrect citations | The Supreme Court rejected a fundamental-rights complaint and criticized the submission for containing numerous incorrect citations and text fragments. Counsel expressly stated that the filing had been produced using artificial intelligence and had not been c... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
 | 2025-10-06 | CA Lyon (FR) — chatgpt analysis rejected as proof | In an application to stay provisional enforcement of a commercial judgment, the applicant alleged that an acceptance/hand-over document was forged. The respondent argued that the applicant’s reliance on an analysis performed using ChatGPT had no probative valu... | ChatGPT | View |
 | 2025-09-23 | trib. latina (lab.) — evidently ai-drafted template claim; article 96 sanctions | The court found the lawsuit to be a low-quality template filing that appeared to be drafted with AI tools, as shown by disordered, abstract, and largely incongruent arguments and citations. It also noted the broader pattern of repetitive template litigation by... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
 | 2025-09-18 | Hof Gent (BE) — possible AI-generated fictitious sources disregarded | The Court of Appeal noted that a party’s submissions included numerous references to decisions that do not exist and incorrect quotations/attributions. The party acknowledged that the cited sources were not checked and stated that “possible use of AI applicat... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
| | 2025-09-16 | trib. torino (lab.) — ai-supported incoherent citations; article 96 sanctions | The court criticised the claimant’s pleading as prepared with the support of artificial intelligence and as consisting of a mass of abstract, disordered, and largely irrelevant legal and case-law citations. It found that this mode of litigation supported a con... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
 | 2025-08-27 | RBROT (nl) — incorrect citations noted; ai use not established | During the hearing, the court established that all Supreme Court citations in the defendant’s statement of defence were incorrect, including mismatched or non-existent ECLI references. Counsel attributed this to a technical issue converting a word file to pdf... | Not Disclosed | View |
 | 2025-08-25 | KG Berlin (DE) — automated filings criticised | In a regulatory-offence appeal context, the court criticised defence submissions as a meaninglessly automated form of litigation using irrelevant boilerplate and invented factual assertions. The court warned that such automated process conduct could lead to de... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
| | 2025-07-02 | AG Köln (DE) — ai-generated fake citations admonished | In a family-law order, the court stated that certain 'prerequisites' attributed to a cited high-court decision were not contained in that decision and were apparently generated by artificial intelligence and invented. The court also stated that the cited sourc... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
| | 2025-06-26 | CA Paris (FR) — chatgpt excerpt offered as access proof | The appeal concerned an interim order about restitution/access to cloud-hosted business data after termination of a software subscription. One party produced a ChatGPT excerpt and appeared to treat it as proof that the other party had the necessary access cred... | ChatGPT | View |