Archive Database | AI Regulation Hub

Date ↓	Case Title	Summary	AI Tool	Action
2026-03-04	Colombian Court Rejects AI Appeal	(1) On March 4, 2026, the Supreme Court of Colombia reviewed a cassation appeal submitted in an ongoing legal dispute. The appeal was found to have been generated primarily by artificial intelligence. (2) The court utilized the Winston AI tool, which determine...	Winston AI tool	View
2026-03-04	Closure of CNIL Injunction Against KASPR	The French data protection authority, CNIL, has officially closed the injunction originally issued against Société KASPR on December 5, 2024. The injunction was related to specific data protection concerns that were being monitored by the CNIL. Following a tho...	—	View
2026-01-26	EU Commission — DSA proceedings re Grok deepfake risks	The European Commission opened formal proceedings under the Digital Services Act (DSA) to investigate whether X properly assessed and mitigated systemic risks linked to deploying Grok features in the EU, including dissemination of manipulated sexually explicit...	Grok (xAI)	View
2026-01-26	E.D. Pa. — Rule 11 sanctions for AI-hallucinated citations (Lifetime Well)	The court imposed Rule 11 sanctions after defense counsel filed memoranda containing false case citations and non-existent quotations, which counsel admitted were linked to the use of generative AI tools. The court found both specially admitted counsel and loc...	Unspecified generati...	View
2026-01-22	ABCA (CA) — Personal costs for AI-hallucinated authorities in factum	The Alberta Court of Appeal ordered personal costs against a lawyer after appellate filings included citations to non-existent precedents described as having been generated by an AI tool. The court treated the “unchecked use of AI” as resulting in a misleading...	Unknown / Not Disclo...	View
2026-01-21	SGHC (SG) — Personal costs after “generative‑AI tool” fictitious authorities	The General Division set aside an ex parte freezing order after finding the claimant’s case was “utterly without merit” and that the controller (a self-represented person) had dishonestly abused court process. In addressing misconduct, the court noted that the...	Unspecified generati...	View
2026-01-21	7th Cir. (US) — Pro se filing with AI-like hallucinated quotations	The Seventh Circuit addressed apparent “hallucinated” quotations attributed to real cases in a pro se appellant’s reply brief and discussed risks of AI-assisted drafting by self-represented litigants. The panel said it was skeptical of the litigant’s denial of...	Unknown / Not Disclo...	View
2026-01-19	SASC (AU) — GenAI litigation guidelines (verification, confidentiality, evidence)	The Supreme Court of South Australia issued court guidelines governing the use of generative AI in litigation steps across South Australian courts, effective for proceedings from 1 January 2026. The guidance emphasizes that lawyers and litigants remain respons...	Unspecified generati...	View
2026-01-12	SC Israel — NIS 3,000 costs for AI-hallucinated authorities	The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal challenging a small-claims judge’s refusal to recuse herself. The court noted that the notice of appeal contained four purported authorities on judicial disqualification that were fictitious. It stated there was an unavoid...	Unspecified generati...	View
2026-01-11	DC Nazareth (IL) — Costs denied over AI-fabricated case law	In an application for an interim injunction to prevent a call on an autonomous bank guarantee, the court granted the temporary injunction pending the main proceedings. However, during the costs analysis the court addressed allegations that applicant’s counsel ...	Unspecified generati...	View

Showing 1 to 10 of 46 cases

← Prev 1 / 5 Next →