Judicial & Litigation Database.

Comprehensive tracker of AI-related court rulings, sanctions, and legal precedents across jurisdictions.

YEAR
TOOL
COUNTRY
LOC Date Case Title Summary AI Tool Action
ES 2024-09-04 TSJ Navarra (ES) — separate piece over AI citation error archived The court had opened a separate proceeding to examine possible procedural bad faith after a filing contained an erroneous reference to the Colombian Penal Code, described as an error stemming from use of artificial intelligence. The party later apologized and... Unknown / Not Disclo... View
NL 2024-06-26 GHDHA (nl) — chatgpt comparator list rejected in bpm dispute In a bpm dispute about determining comparable vehicles, the appellant used ChatGPT to generate a list of cars said to be in the same economic context and competitive position. The court held that such an AI-generated list, without further substantiation, is i... ChatGPT View
NL 2024-03-05 GHDHA (nl) — chatgpt-derived valuation assertions discounted The court noted that the appellant relied on assertions derived from ChatGPT in challenging the valuation, but the appellant did not explain what question was entered into ChatGPT and did not substantiate the assertions. The AI-derived points therefore did no... ChatGPT View
US 2024-01-30 2d cir (us) — chatgpt fake citation referred to grievance panel The court addressed counsel’s admission that she cited a non-existent state-court decision in a reply brief after relying on ChatGPT to identify precedent. The court stated this conduct fell below basic obligations of counsel. It referred the attorney to the ... ChatGPT View
US 2023-06-22 sdny (us) — chatgpt hallucinated citations sanctioned The court found that counsel filed submissions containing non-existent judicial opinions with fake quotations and citations generated by ChatGPT and then continued to stand by those authorities after their authenticity was challenged. It emphasized that using... ChatGPT View
PF 2023-05-11 ta polynésie fr. (fr) — claimant cites chatgpt for standing arguments In a référé-constat request, the claimant reported that he submitted the matter to ChatGPT, which purportedly identified arguments supporting his standing (intérêt à agir). The court did not rely on the AI output and instead held that the claimant failed to s... ChatGPT View
← Prev 5 / 5 Next →