Judicial & Litigation Database.

Comprehensive tracker of AI-related court rulings, sanctions, and legal precedents across jurisdictions.

YEAR
TOOL
COUNTRY
LOC Date Case Title Summary AI Tool Action
CA 2026-01-22 ABCA (CA) — Personal costs for AI-hallucinated authorities in factum The Alberta Court of Appeal ordered personal costs against a lawyer after appellate filings included citations to non-existent precedents described as having been generated by an AI tool. The court treated the “unchecked use of AI” as resulting in a misleading... Unknown / Not Disclo... View
SG 2026-01-21 SGHC (SG) — Personal costs after “generative‑AI tool” fictitious authorities The General Division set aside an ex parte freezing order after finding the claimant’s case was “utterly without merit” and that the controller (a self-represented person) had dishonestly abused court process. In addressing misconduct, the court noted that the... Unspecified generati... View
US 2026-01-21 7th Cir. (US) — Pro se filing with AI-like hallucinated quotations The Seventh Circuit addressed apparent “hallucinated” quotations attributed to real cases in a pro se appellant’s reply brief and discussed risks of AI-assisted drafting by self-represented litigants. The panel said it was skeptical of the litigant’s denial of... Unknown / Not Disclo... View
AU 2026-01-19 SASC (AU) — GenAI litigation guidelines (verification, confidentiality, evidence) The Supreme Court of South Australia issued court guidelines governing the use of generative AI in litigation steps across South Australian courts, effective for proceedings from 1 January 2026. The guidance emphasizes that lawyers and litigants remain respons... Unspecified generati... View
IL 2026-01-12 SC Israel — NIS 3,000 costs for AI-hallucinated authorities The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal challenging a small-claims judge’s refusal to recuse herself. The court noted that the notice of appeal contained four purported authorities on judicial disqualification that were fictitious. It stated there was an unavoid... Unspecified generati... View
IL 2026-01-11 DC Nazareth (IL) — Costs denied over AI-fabricated case law In an application for an interim injunction to prevent a call on an autonomous bank guarantee, the court granted the temporary injunction pending the main proceedings. However, during the costs analysis the court addressed allegations that applicant’s counsel ... Unspecified generati... View
US 2026-01-05 S.D.N.Y. — ChatGPT logs discovery order affirmed In the consolidated OpenAI copyright litigation, the district judge denied OpenAI’s objections to two magistrate judge discovery orders requiring production of a 20 million-conversation, de-identified sample of consumer ChatGPT logs to news and class plaintiff... ChatGPT View
US 2026-01-02 S.D. Ohio — OSC over fabricated citations (AI suspected) The court sustained third-party defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissed the counterclaim/third-party complaint against them with prejudice. In reviewing the defendants’ motion practice, the court identified repeated citations to non-existent cases and/or a... Unspecified generati... View
FR 2025-12-18 TJ Périgueux (FR) — ai 'hallucinations' warning In a social-security dispute over an adult disability allowance overpayment, the tribunal noted that some case-law references cited by the claimant did not appear to match published decisions and warned counsel to verify references found via search engines or ... Unknown / Not Disclo... View
BE 2025-12-15 Orb. Gent (BE) — hearing ordered over “AI applications” and fictitious case-law The enterprise court found that a manifestly unfounded request to reopen debates relied on supposed constitutional and cassation judgments that “do not exist,” forcing the court to spend scarce time verifying non-existent case-law. The court rejected the reque... Unknown / Not Disclo... View
← Prev 1 / 5 Next →