Judicial & Litigation Database.
Comprehensive tracker of AI-related court rulings, sanctions, and legal precedents across jurisdictions.
| LOC | Date ↓ | Case Title | Summary | AI Tool | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-22 | ABCA (CA) — Personal costs for AI-hallucinated authorities in factum | The Alberta Court of Appeal ordered personal costs against a lawyer after appellate filings included citations to non-existent precedents described as having been generated by an AI tool. The court treated the “unchecked use of AI” as resulting in a misleading... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
| 2026-01-21 | SGHC (SG) — Personal costs after “generative‑AI tool” fictitious authorities | The General Division set aside an ex parte freezing order after finding the claimant’s case was “utterly without merit” and that the controller (a self-represented person) had dishonestly abused court process. In addressing misconduct, the court noted that the... | Unspecified generati... | View |
| 2026-01-21 | 7th Cir. (US) — Pro se filing with AI-like hallucinated quotations | The Seventh Circuit addressed apparent “hallucinated” quotations attributed to real cases in a pro se appellant’s reply brief and discussed risks of AI-assisted drafting by self-represented litigants. The panel said it was skeptical of the litigant’s denial of... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
| 2026-01-19 | SASC (AU) — GenAI litigation guidelines (verification, confidentiality, evidence) | The Supreme Court of South Australia issued court guidelines governing the use of generative AI in litigation steps across South Australian courts, effective for proceedings from 1 January 2026. The guidance emphasizes that lawyers and litigants remain respons... | Unspecified generati... | View |
| 2026-01-12 | SC Israel — NIS 3,000 costs for AI-hallucinated authorities | The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal challenging a small-claims judge’s refusal to recuse herself. The court noted that the notice of appeal contained four purported authorities on judicial disqualification that were fictitious. It stated there was an unavoid... | Unspecified generati... | View |
| 2026-01-11 | DC Nazareth (IL) — Costs denied over AI-fabricated case law | In an application for an interim injunction to prevent a call on an autonomous bank guarantee, the court granted the temporary injunction pending the main proceedings. However, during the costs analysis the court addressed allegations that applicant’s counsel ... | Unspecified generati... | View |
| 2026-01-05 | S.D.N.Y. — ChatGPT logs discovery order affirmed | In the consolidated OpenAI copyright litigation, the district judge denied OpenAI’s objections to two magistrate judge discovery orders requiring production of a 20 million-conversation, de-identified sample of consumer ChatGPT logs to news and class plaintiff... | ChatGPT | View |
| 2026-01-02 | S.D. Ohio — OSC over fabricated citations (AI suspected) | The court sustained third-party defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissed the counterclaim/third-party complaint against them with prejudice. In reviewing the defendants’ motion practice, the court identified repeated citations to non-existent cases and/or a... | Unspecified generati... | View |
| 2025-12-18 | TJ Périgueux (FR) — ai 'hallucinations' warning | In a social-security dispute over an adult disability allowance overpayment, the tribunal noted that some case-law references cited by the claimant did not appear to match published decisions and warned counsel to verify references found via search engines or ... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |
| 2025-12-15 | Orb. Gent (BE) — hearing ordered over “AI applications” and fictitious case-law | The enterprise court found that a manifestly unfounded request to reopen debates relied on supposed constitutional and cassation judgments that “do not exist,” forcing the court to spend scarce time verifying non-existent case-law. The court rejected the reque... | Unknown / Not Disclo... | View |