FR flag
FR | Tribunal judiciaire de Périgueux (pôle social) Docket: RG 23/452 minute 25/00509 • first instance
2025-12-18

tribunal judiciaire de périgueux (pôle social) — jugement du 18 décembre 2025 — minute 25/00509

Unknown / Not Disclosed (AI mentioned, tool not specified) no human verificationsuspected hallucinated citation

I. Executive Summary

In a social-security dispute over an adult disability allowance overpayment, the tribunal noted that some case-law references cited by the claimant did not appear to match published decisions and warned counsel to verify references found via search engines or AI to avoid 'hallucinations'. On the merits, the tribunal held that the social security body failed to comply with its statutory duty to inform the claimant about third-party information and documents used (a substantial formality). It declared the control procedure null and annulled the overpayment claim. The tribunal dismissed the damages claim and ordered the social security body to pay costs.

II. Conduct Analysis

The claimant cited case-law references that the tribunal said did not appear to correspond to published decisions, and the tribunal explicitly cautioned against relying on AI-assisted research that may produce 'hallucinations' without verification.

III. Legal Foundations

article L114-21, code de la sécurité sociale article 696, code de procédure civile

IV. Key Facts

1) The tribunal observed that some jurisprudence references cited by the claimant (without producing the decisions) did not correspond to published decisions and gave an example of a mismatched case number. 2) It warned the claimant and counsel to verify references found via search engines or AI to ensure they are not 'hallucinations'. 3) The tribunal held the CAF failed to meet its information duty under article L114-21 and declared the control procedure null, annulling the 3,777.05 euro overpayment.

V. Consequences & Sanction

1) Control procedure declared null. 2) Overpayment claim of 3,777.05 euros annulled. 3) Damages claim rejected. 4) CAF ordered to pay costs.